vishay soochi
bhakti sudha -karapatri maharaj
shrirasalilarahasy
“gramyaiah saman gramyavadishacheshtitamh.” un ganvar gvalabaloan ke sath ve graminoan ki-si hi cheshtaean kiya karate the. yah unake prematishay ka hi phal tha. yadi kaho ki aisa ho hi nahian sakata; kyoanki ‘n sanddashe tishthati roopamasy’, ‘yanmanasa n manute’ ityadi vachanoan ke anusar brahm to samast indriyoan ka avishay hai. vah vrindavanavasiyoan ki indriyoan ka vishay kaise ho sakata hai? to aisa kahana thik nahian; kyoanki ‘yanmanasa n manute’ ityadi shrutiyoan ke anusar vah samast indriyoan ka avashiy hone par bhi ‘drishyate tvagrayaya buddhya’ is shruti ke anusar sookshm buddhi ka vishay to hai hi. isi prakar h premadrishti ka bhi vishay ho hi sakata hai. jis prakar ‘drishyate tvagrayaya buddhya’ is shruti ko dekhakar ap yah kalpana karate haian ki vah sanskrit buddhi ka hi vishay hota hai, asanskrit buddhi ka vishay nahian hota, usi prakar ham bhi yah kah sakate haian ki vah premadrishti ka vishay hai; kyoanki is sambandh mean ye vaky praman haian-
yadi kaho ki nahian, man se brahm nahian dekha ja sakata. ‘drishyate tvagrayay buddhya’ is vaky ka arth keval itana hi hai ki mahavaky ke shravan se brahm ka avaran nivritt hota hai; phir to svayan prakash brahm ka svatah hi sphuran ho jayaga, to ham bhi yahi kah deange ki brahm svayan prakash hai, premadrishti se keval usaka avaran nivritt ho jata hai. ab yadi tumhara aisa vichar ho ki iandriyagocharatvaroop hetu ke karan brahm mithya hai to aisa siddh nahian hoan sakata, kyoanki indriyoan ki avishayata to paramanuoan mean bhi hai tathapi ve mithya nahian mane gaye haian. atah indriyagocharataroop hetu mithya tattv ka sadhak nahian hai. |
tika tippani aur sandarbh
sanbandhit lekh
kram sankhya | vishay | prishth sankhya |
varnamala kramanusar lekh khoj