vishay soochi
shrikrishnaank
krishnastu bhagavan svayam
yah saty hai ki lokadrishti mean unaki avastha itani hi thi, jitani batalayi gayi hai; kintu usase yah nishkarsh nikal lena ki vah nire apakv vay balak the, thik nahian hai. un vakyoan par jo is mat ke spasht virodhi hai, ham n bhi dhyan dean to bhi yah sabhi par prakat hai ki jis balak ne aanguliyoan par vishal govardhan parvat ko utha liya tha aur jisane l dakapan mean hi anyany anek asadharan lilaean dikhalayi thian, usaki sharir vriddhi tatha vayaskata ko sadharan kasauti par rakhana niri moodhata hai. kam se kam gopiyoan ko to unaki vayaskata ke vishay mean kisi prakar ka bhram nahian tha; kyoanki ve shrikrishn ko pati ke roop mean prapt karane ke liye katyayani devi ki pooja karati thian; aur unaki yah abhilasha asvabhavik bhi nahian samajhi gayi thi. ve devoan se prarthana karati thian- '..........nandagopasutan devi patian me kuru.' arthat he devi ! mujhe nand nandan ko pati ke roop mean pradan karo. is sambandh mean kabhi kabhi ek doosari yukti yah upasthit ki jati hai ki vastav mean rasalila kabhi huee hi nahian, yah keval prakriti aur purush ke madhy sarvada hone vali nityalila ka vyanjak svaroop hai. nissandeh yah bat bhi hai, bhagavan ki anant lila nity hai, parantu keval yahi ho, so bat nahian, yadyapi bhagavan ki any samast lilaoan ki bhaanti isaka bhi adhyatmik arth lagaya gaya hai tathapi raja parikshit se lekar shrichaitanyadev tak sabhi mahan vaishnav bhaktoan ne ise sachchi ghatana ke roop mean bhi mana hai. sadachar ke vishay mean shrichaitanyadev ke nij ke vichar itane kattar the ki ek bar unhoanne apane ek shishy ko keval isi aparadh mean sada ke liye nikal diya tha ki vah ek vriddha bhakt stri ( madhavi ) se bhiksha maang laya tha. phir bhi shrichaitanyadev ko rasalila mean koee apattijanak bat dikhalayi nahian di. yadi ham rasalila ko roopak manean to mahabharat tatha any sabhi lilaoan ko bhi aisi kyoan n mana jave? par aisi bat nahian hai. |
tika tippani aur sandarbh
sanbandhit lekh
kram sankhya | vishay | prishth sankhya |