|
sar g aaudaphre higinhs (Sir Godfrey Higgines) jo pichhali shatabhdi ka ek prasiddh vidvan aur puratathvavisharad tha, ythashakti is vishay ka uchit anusandhan evan gaveshana karane ke bad is nishhchay par pahuancha tha ki pital ke yug (Brazenage)[1] ke ant mean shrikrishn ka janm hua tha. usane likha hai-
He passed a life of the most extraordinary and incomprehensible devotion. His birth was concealed from the tyrant Kansa, to whom it had been predicted that on born at that time and in that family would destroy him, i.e., his power.'
arthat shrikrishhn ne athyant vilakshan evan asadharan bhaktimay jivan vhyatit kiya. athyachari kans se inaka janhm chhipakar rakha gaya tha, khyoanki use kisi ne yah bat kah rakhi thi ki amuk samay mean us kul mean uthpanhn hone vala purush tumhhare arthat tumhhari sathta ke nash ka karan hoga. apane granhth ‘Anacalypsis’ (ji.1 pri.160) mean bhi inhhoanne likha hai-
In Fact, the sculptures on the walls of the most ancient temples by no one ever doublted to be long anterior to the Christian era, as well as written works equally old, prove beyong the possibility of doubt, the superior antiquity of the history of Cristna to that of Jesus.
arthat ‘vashtav mean uthpanhn prachin devalayoan ki- jo eeshvi san se bahut poorvakal ke bane hue haian is bat mean moortiyoan tatha usi samay ki hashtalikhit pushtakoan ke dekhane se yah nirvivad siddh hai ki eesamasih ki apeksha shrikrishhn ka kal kahian adhik prachin hai’. is vidvan ne shrikrishhn ki prachinata ko nahian manane vale vidvanoan ke mat ka khanhdan karate hue apane usi granhth mean likha hai-
Cristna, his statues, temples and books etc., respecting him are to be found where a Christian never came. Is it not absurd to suppose that that Brahmins could invert the story of Cristna and make it dovetail into all their other superstitions make him from an integral part of their curious Trinity, the actual Trinity of ancient Persia and of Plato-make him also fit into the theological inferences of the modern Christians respecting the meaning of the first chapter of Genesis-make his story exactly agree with the orthodox massacre of the innocents and finally make all this be received as an ancient doctrine and article of faith by millions of people, who must have known very well that it was all perfectly well that it was all perfectly new to them and that they had never heard of it before.’
|
|